Foucault

Foucault Encompassing All Of Foucault S Published Work, This Book Provides An Array Of Secondary Literature About Foucault Including His Philosophical History, His Debts To Other Thinkers, And His Complex Relationship To French Structuralism This Book Raises Important Queries As To The Ultimate Value And Legitimacy Of His Variety Of Philosophical Rhetoric, With Its Attendant View Of The Role Of The Modern Intellectual This Is The Dutch Translation Of This Work

Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Foucault book, this is one of the most wanted José Guilherme Merquior author readers around the world.

[Reading] ➶ Foucault  Author José Guilherme Merquior – Couponpromocode.us
  • Paperback
  • 192 pages
  • Foucault
  • José Guilherme Merquior
  • 23 September 2017
  • 0006862268

10 thoughts on “Foucault

  1. says:

    Foucault, c1985, Jose Guilherme Merquior 1941 1991 Foucault 1985 second edition 1991 is a book about the French intellectual Michel Foucault by the Brazilian critic and sociologist Jos Guilherme Merquior, in which the author provides a critical evaluation of Foucault, including works such as Madness and Civilization 1961 and The History of Sexuality 1976 Foucault received praise from several scholars, but has also been criticized The book is part of the Fontana Modern Masters series Foucault, c1985, Jose Guilherme Merquior 1941 1991 Foucault 1985 second edition 1991 is a book about the French intellectual Michel Foucault by the Brazilian critic and sociologist Jos Guilherme Merquior, in which the author provides a critical evaluation of Foucault, including works such as Madness and Civilization 1961 and The History of Sexuality 1976 Foucault received praise from several scholars, but h...

  2. says:

    , , .

  3. says:

    now this islike what i expected written in foucault s era, just after his death so early work, lived assessment, caricatures in beginning have a hard time reading this without thinking of the other foucault, especially may perhaps would have been better to read this first, but then i might not have been interested incritical, in tone as much as content, wonder why the author wrote this he might be an analytic sort of phil, certainly not sympathetic with f s reasoning, f s sou now this islike what i expected written in foucault s era, just after his death so early work, lived assessment, caricatures in beginning have a hard time reading this without thinking of the other foucault, especially may perhaps would have been better to read this first, but then i might not have been interested incritical, in tone as much as content, wonder why the author wrote this he might be an analytic sort of phil, certainly not sympathetic with f s reasoning, f s sources, f s techniques this makes me wonder why i have no trouble reading of this, a lot of trouble reading wittgenstein f has provocative ideas, rather inexact histories, elaborate and extreme ideas of how institutions, practices, ways of thought, shift from one unconscious characterization of the real to the next but what exercises the author s...

  4. says:

    Merquior sums up most of his views on p 144 First, his history as, I daresay, has been abundantly demonstrated throughout this book is far from being always sound No doubt it often opens up new perspectives and has thereby heuristic virtues But its conceptual muddles and explanatory weaknesses and mark it is always an argumentative history, an histoire th sethan outweigh its real contributio...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *